Pakistan T20 Squad Announced for England and Ireland Tour: Haris Rauf and Hasan Ali Return2/18/2024 Pakistan has unveiled their T20 squad for the upcoming tour of England and Ireland, as they gear up for the T20 World Cup. The team, captained by Babar Azam, features the comeback of fast bowler Haris Rauf and medium-pacer Hasan Ali. The squad also includes injured wicketkeepers Azam Khan and Mohammad Rizwan. However, the final lineup for the T20 World Cup is yet to be announced. Squad Selection:1. Haris Rauf and Hasan Ali make a comeback to the squad. 2. Azam Khan and Mohammad Rizwan included despite recent injuries. 3. The final World Cup squad will be determined during the England tour. 4. All 20 teams have submitted their preliminary squads to the ICC Injury Comebacks:1. Haris Rauf, recovering from a shoulder dislocation, is expected to regain match fitness. 2. Azam Khan, Mohammad Rizwan, and Muhammad Irfan Khan have been included despite recent injuries sustained against New Zealand. Hasan Ali's Inclusion:1. Hasan Ali, not part of the T20 squad since September 2022, has been included as a backup option. 2. Impressive performances for Warwickshire and Karachi Kings have earned him consideration. Opportunities for Usman Khan and Agha Salman:1. Usman Khan, who switched allegiance to Pakistan, has been given another chance despite a lackluster performance against New Zealand. 2. Agha Salman, a spinning all-rounder, is in line for his T20 debut. Spin Department:1. Agha Salman joins Shadab Khan, Abrar Ahmed, Imad Wasim, and Iftikhar Ahmed in the spin department. 2. Usama Mir and Zaman Khan, who featured in the series against New Zealand, have been left out. Tour Details:1. Pakistan will play matches against Ireland in Dublin and England at various venues. 2. The tour will serve as the final preparation for the T20 World Cup. Pakistan T20 squad for matches in Ireland and England includes:
Conclusion:Pakistan's T20 squad for the England and Ireland tour includes a mix of experienced players and those making comebacks from injuries. The selectors have emphasized that the final World Cup squad will be determined based on the performances and fitness of the players during the tour. The team will be looking to build momentum and find the right combination ahead of the T20 World Cup
0 Comments
Team Squads: PSL 2024
Here's a revised presentation of the Pakistan Super League 2024 player list in a more organized and elegant sequence:
Islamabad United
Platinum: Shadab Khan, Naseem Shah
Diamond: Imad Wasim, Azam Khan Brand Ambassador: Faheem Ashraf Gold: Alex Hales, Colin Munro Silver: Rumman Raees Other Players: Tymal Mills, Matthew Forde, Salman Agha, Qasim Akram, Shahab Khan, Hunain Shah, Ubaid Shah, Shamyl Hussain, Tom Curran (injured), Jordan Cox, Haider Ali, Obed McCoy Islamabad United Squad - PSL 2024
Karachi Kings
Diamond: James Vince, Hassan Ali
Brand Ambassador: Shan Masood Mentor: Shoaib Malik Gold: Tabraiz Shamsi, Mir Hamza Silver: Muhammad Akhlaq Emerging: Irfan Khan Other Players: Mohammad Nawaz, Kieron Pollard, Daniel Sams, Tim Seifert, Mohammad Amir Khan, Anwar Ali, Arafat Minhas, Sirajuddin, Saad Baig, Jamie Overton, Zahid Mehmood (partial replacement for Zahid Mehmood), Leus du Plooy, Mohammad Rohid Karachi Kings Squad - PSL 2024
Lahore Qalandars
Platinum: Shaheen Shah Afridi
Brand Ambassador: Haris Rauf Diamond: David Wiese Gold: Sikandar Raza, Abdullah Shafique, Zaman Khan Silver: Mirza Baig, Rashid Khan (injured) Other Players: Fakhar Zaman, Sahibzada Farhan, Mohammad Imran, Ahsan Bhatti, Dan Lawrence (partially unavailable), Jahandad Khan, Syed Faridoun, Shai Hope, Kamran Ghulam, Rassie van der Dussen, Bhanuka Rajapaksa, Tayyab Abbas Lahore Qalandars Squad - PSL 2024
Multan Sultans
Platinum: Mohammad Rizwan, Iftikhar Ahmed
Diamond: Khushdil Shah, Usama Mir Brand Ambassador: Ihsanullah Emerging: Faisal Akram Gold: Abbas Afridi Silver: Dawid Malan, Reeze Hendricks, Reece Topley, Tayyab Tahir, Shahnawaz Dahani, Mohammad Ali, Usman Khan, Yasir Khan Other Players: Chris Jordan, Aftab Ibrahim, David Willey, Johnson Charles, Muhammad Shahzad Multan Sultans Squad - PSL 2024
Peshawar Zalmi
Platinum: Babar Azam, Rovman Powell
Diamond: Saim Ayub, Tom Kohler-Cadmore Brand Ambassador: Mohammad Haris Gold: Aamir Jamal Silver: Khurram Shahzad Emerging: Haseebullah Khan Other Players: Asif Ali, Naveen-ul-Haq (partially unavailable), Umair Afridi, Dan Mousley, Gus Atkinson, Mohammad Zeeshan, Lungi Ngidi (Waqar Salamkheil), Mehran Mumtaz, Noor Ahmad (replaced by Gus Atkinson), Salman Irshad, Arif Yaqoob, Shamar Joseph (partial replacement for Gus Atkinson), Arshad Iqbal (partial replacement for Khurram Shahzad), Luke Wood Peshawar Zalmi Squad - PSL 2024
Quetta Gladiators
Platinum: Rilee Rossouw
Diamond: Mohammad Wasim, Jason Roy, Wanindu Hasaranga Brand Ambassador: Sarfaraz Ahmed Gold: Abrar Ahmed, Mohammad Hasnain Silver: Mohammad Amir, Will Smeed Other Players: Saud Shakeel, Sajjad Ali, Usman Qadir, Adil Naz, Khawaja Nafay, Akeal Hosein, Sohail Khan, Omair Yousuf, Sherfane Rutherford, Bismillah Khan (partial replacement for Wanindu Hasaranga), Sufiyan Muqeem Quetta Gladiators Squad - PSL 2024
PSL 2024 Fixture & Venues
Sat, 17 Feb '24
Sat, 24 Feb '24
Sat, 09 Mar '24
PSL 9 Venues: Where the Action Unfolds
In PSL 9, the schedule features 34 matches, spanning playoffs and the final, kicking off on 17 February. The tournament unfolds across four venues, with the final slated for 18 March in Karachi. Play-offs will also be held in Karachi.
Teams will play both home and away matches. Islamabad United and Peshawar Zalmi's home matches are in Rawalpindi, Karachi and Quetta play home matches in Karachi, Multan hosts matches at Multan, and Lahore plays at Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore. Karachi hosts 11 matches, followed by Lahore and Rawalpindi with nine each, and Multan hosting five. Key fixtures include Lahore vs. Karachi and Quetta vs. Peshawar. Multan Sultans seek revenge against Lahore, having lost in the last two PSL finals. Islamabad aims to triumph over Lahore after two defeats in the group stages. City-wise match distribution:
Leg Before Wicket (LBW) in cricket remains a crucial method of dismissing a batsman, subject to the interpretation of various factors by the umpire upon an appeal from the fielding side. The umpire can rule a batsman out LBW if the ball, instead of hitting the wicket, strikes any part of the batsman's body, excluding the hand holding the bat. This decision depends on factors such as where the ball pitched, its line with the wickets, the expected trajectory after striking the batsman, and the batsman's intent. The inception of the LBW rule dates back to 1774 when batsmen began using their pads to safeguard the wicket. Over time, refinements were introduced to clarify the ball's pitch and eliminate the ambiguity surrounding a batsman's intentions. The law governing LBW dismissals remained largely unchanged from 1839 for almost a century. However, as the 19th century progressed, batsmen developed techniques like "pad-play" to minimize their risk of dismissal. Despite several unsuccessful attempts at reform, the law expanded in 1935, allowing batsmen to be dismissed LBW even if the ball pitched outside the off-stump line. Critics argued that this change favored defensive tactics over leg spin bowling, potentially making the game less appealing. Further modifications were made in 1972 to address the prevalence of pad-play. The revised law, still in effect today, permits LBW dismissals in specific scenarios where batsmen refrain from attempting to strike the ball with their bat. The introduction of television replays and later, ball-tracking technology since the 1990s has led to an increase in LBW decisions in major matches. However, the accuracy of this technology and its implications remain contentious. As Gerald Brodribb noted in his 1995 survey of cricket laws, LBW has been a subject of debate since its inception due to its complexities. It is often misunderstood by the general public and has sparked controversies among spectators, administrators, and commentators. LBW decisions have even incited crowd unrest on occasion, and the percentage of LBW dismissals has steadily risen over the years. Understand the Leg Before Wicket (LBW) Rules in CricketThe current definition of LBW is outlined in Law 36 of the Laws of Cricket established by the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC). Before a batsman can be dismissed via LBW, the fielding team must appeal to the umpire. If the bowler delivers a no-ball, the batsman cannot be declared LBW under any circumstances. Otherwise, several conditions must be met for an LBW dismissal to be considered: 1. The ball, if it bounces, must pitch either in line with or on the off side of the wickets. 2. The ball must hit a part of the batsman's body without first touching their bat. 3. The ball must be in line with the wickets and must be projected to hit the stumps after hitting the batsman. 4. Alternatively, a batsman may be declared LBW if he makes no attempt to hit the ball with the bat and is hit outside the stump line by a ball that should have hit the wicket. 5. The umpire must assume that the ball would have continued on the same trajectory after striking the batsman, even if it would have bounced before hitting the stumps. It's important to note that a batsman can be out LBW even if the ball did not hit their leg, although such occurrences are exceptionally rare. However, a batsman cannot be declared LBW if the ball pitches on the leg side of the stumps, even if it would have otherwise hit the wickets. Additionally, if a batsman attempts to hit the ball with their bat and the ball strikes them outside the line of the off stump, they cannot be declared LBW. In some cases involving unorthodox cricket shots like the switch hit or reverse sweep, where the batsman switches between right- and left-handed stances, determining the off and leg side becomes complex. The law specifies that the off side is determined by the batsman's stance when the bowler begins their run-up. According to MCC guidelines for umpires, several factors influence an LBW decision. These factors include the angle and swing of the ball, the height of the ball at impact, and the batsman's distance from the wicket. Umpires must assess whether the ball would have passed over or struck the stumps. While making a decision is relatively straightforward when the ball strikes the batsman without bouncing, it becomes more challenging when there is a shorter time interval between the ball pitching and striking the batsman. In conclusion, LBW in cricket has evolved over centuries, undergoing various changes to address issues such as pad-play and promote fairness in the game. However, it remains a subject of debate and controversy due to its intricate nature and the subjective interpretation involved in umpiring decisions. Evolution of the Leg Before Wicket (LBW) Rule in Cricket The evolution of the LBW rule in cricket spans a rich history that mirrors the sport's dynamic nature. Let's explore the journey of how LBW has evolved over time. Origins and Early DevelopmentThe inception and early development of the LBW rule in cricket trace back to the 18th century when the game's laws were still in their infancy. Surprisingly, the earliest written version of the Laws of Cricket from 1744 did not explicitly mention the LBW rule. This omission can be attributed to the prevalent use of curved bats during that period, which made it impractical for batsmen to stand directly in front of the wickets. However, as cricket bats gradually evolved to become straighter, allowing batsmen to position themselves closer to the wickets, concerns arose regarding deliberate obstruction of the ball from hitting the wickets. In response to these concerns, a revision of the laws in 1774 introduced the concept of LBW, stating that a batsman would be out if they intentionally blocked the ball with their leg. Despite this initial attempt to address the issue, ambiguity persisted, particularly concerning the interpretation of a batsman's intentions by umpires. Clarity and Ambiguity: 1823 to 1839In subsequent years, efforts were made to refine and clarify the LBW rule. The 1823 amendment stipulated that "the ball must be delivered in a straight line to the wicket," aiming to provide clearer guidelines for umpires. However, ambiguity persisted as prominent umpires disagreed on whether the ball had to travel in a straight line from the bowler to the wicket or between the wickets at either end of the pitch. In 1839, the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), responsible for formulating the Laws of Cricket, embraced the latter interpretation, making it a key milestone in the evolution of the LBW rule. According to this interpretation, a batsman could be declared LBW if the ball pitched between the wickets and was bound for the stumps, irrespective of the trajectory from the bowler. Controversy and Reform AttemptsDespite the clarity provided by the 1839 interpretation, the LBW rule continued to be a subject of controversy and debate throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The rise in LBW dismissals, particularly in county cricket during the 1880s, sparked concerns about the prevalence of defensive tactics such as pad-play. Various proposals were put forth to address pad-play and rebalance the game in favor of bowlers. In 1888, representatives of county cricket clubs supported a motion stating that a batsman should be out if they blocked a ball that would have hit the wicket, regardless of where the ball pitched. However, these proposals failed to gain sufficient traction for law changes. Prominent cricketers endorsed similar amendments in subsequent years, advocating for stricter LBW rules to discourage defensive tactics. Despite repeated attempts to reform the LBW rule, including proposals to increase the size of stumps, no significant changes were implemented. The evolution of the LBW rule in cricket reflects the sport's ongoing efforts to strike a balance between bat and ball. From its origins in the 18th century to the debates and reform attempts in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the LBW rule has undergone significant developments aimed at clarifying its interpretation and addressing issues such as pad-play. Despite the challenges and controversies surrounding LBW, it remains an integral aspect of cricket's laws, shaping the dynamics of the game for centuries. The LBW Evolution and the Technology Impact in CricketThe development of the LBW rule in cricket has undergone significant changes over the years, influenced by both tactical considerations and technological advancements. This exploration delves into the evolution of the LBW rule and the impact of technology on the game. Rise of Pad-Play and Rule ChangeDuring the 1950s and 1960s, the tactic of pad-play became increasingly prevalent in cricket, especially in response to challenging and unpredictable pitches. Critics viewed this tactic as negative and unfair, prompting the need for rule modifications to discourage it and promote leg spin bowling. A revised version of the LBW law was introduced to address pad-play, initially implemented in Australia and the West Indies during the 1969-70 season and later in England in 1970. This modification allowed a batsman to be declared LBW if a ball pitched in line with the wickets or outside the off stump, and the umpire deemed that the batsman made no genuine attempt to play the ball with their bat. The introduction of this revised law aimed to encourage batsmen to take more risks, leading to more attractive cricket. However, it also resulted in a decline in the percentage of LBW dismissals. Subsequently, in Australia, there was a proposal to reinstate the previous law, which allowed a batsman to be bowled out LBW if the ball landed outside the stumps and hit any part of the batsman's body except his hands.This amendment was adopted worldwide in 1972, leading to a significant increase in LBW dismissals. The Influence of TechnologySince 1993, there has been a noticeable increase in LBW dismissals in English cricket, attributed to the incorporation of ball-tracking technology like Hawk-Eye by broadcasters in television coverage. This technology's accuracy gained acceptance among cricket enthusiasts, and replay analyses revealed a higher proportion of balls hitting an outstretched leg subsequently hitting the stumps. Umpires are also more susceptible to these findings, improving their understanding of which balls are likely to hit the stumps and increasing their likelihood of making LBW decisions, especially when the batsman is further away from the stumps.This trend extended to international cricket, where the increasing use of technology in reviewing decisions altered umpires' attitudes, particularly benefiting spin bowlers. However, the adoption of on-field technology remains a subject of controversy, with debates over its reliability compared to human judgment. Some argue that technology is more reliable, while others believe that umpires are better equipped to make decisions. Impact of the Umpire Decision Review System (DRS)The International Cricket Council (ICC) introduced the Umpire Decision Review System (DRS) in 2009, allowing teams to challenge on-field umpire decisions using television replays and ball-tracking technology. DRS increases the frequency with which LBW calls are awarded as umpires realize that erroneous calls can be corrected. Critics of DRS argue that the rules for using it have led to inconsistency in approach, depending on the referral's circumstances. There are also concerns about the reliability of ball-tracking technology used in LBW decisions, although the ICC asserts its 100% accuracy. In conclusion, the LBW rule in cricket continues to evolve alongside technological advancements, sparking debates and reshaping the dynamics of the sport. LBW in Cricket: Trends, Perceptions, and ControversiesThe Leg Before Wicket (LBW) rule in cricket has been a subject of continual evolution and debate, shaping the dynamics of the game. This study explores trends in LBW layoffs and the perceptions and controversies associated with this rule. Trends in LBW DismissalsA comprehensive study conducted by Douglas Miller in 2011 provides insights into the trends in LBW dismissals, particularly in English county cricket. Over the years, there has been a noticeable upward trajectory in the proportion of wickets falling LBW. From the 1920s to the 2010s, this proportion increased steadily, with peaks and troughs along the way. Notably, the decade preceding 2010 witnessed a significant rise, with nearly 19% of dismissals being LBW. Miller's research also unveils an interesting trend regarding the influence of team captains on LBW decisions. Statistical analysis indicates that captains of county teams were less likely to be dismissed LBW when batting and more likely to dismiss opposing batters LBW when bowling. This trend can be partially attributed to historical practices where captains' reports on umpires influenced decision-making. Additionally, before 1963, when this practice ceased, umpires tended to show leniency towards amateur cricketers due to their influence on umpires' careers. On a global scale, matches played on the Indian subcontinent were statistically more likely to see LBW dismissals. However, batters from the subcontinent were less likely to be dismissed LBW regardless of the venue. Perceptions and ControversiesLBW decisions have consistently been a source of controversy and debate within cricketing circles. Critics often argue that LBW is one of the most intricate rules to comprehend, likening its complexity to association football's offside rule, thereby contributing to confusion among those less familiar with the sport. The interpretational complexity of LBW is exacerbated by the fact that umpires not only have to determine what occurred but also speculate on what might have happened. Contentious elements of LBW decisions include assessing whether the ball pitched outside leg stump and, in certain instances, determining the batter's intention to play the ball or leave it. Umpires frequently face criticism for their LBW decisions from players, commentators, and spectators alike. The contentious nature of LBW decisions has historically resulted in protests, arguments, and even crowd disturbances during matches. For example, a notable incident occurred during a 1996 One Day International in India when a disputed LBW decision against Mohammad Azharuddin incited a prolonged crowd disturbance, leading to items being thrown onto the field and a delay in the match. In summary, LBW in cricket is not only a pivotal rule but also a subject of ongoing discussion, characterized by trends in dismissals and a reputation for complexity and controversy. Understanding the Impact in LBWIn the context of cricket, particularly regarding the Leg Before Wicket (LBW) rule, "impact" holds significant importance. It refers to the crucial moment when the ball strikes the batsman's body, usually below the knee, and plays a decisive role in determining whether the batsman is declared out or not. LBW serves as a method for the fielding team to dismiss a batsman. It occurs when the ball, instead of hitting the bat, makes contact with the batsman's leg or body. However, the batsman can only be given out LBW if specific conditions are met, which involve where the ball strikes the batsman, the trajectory of the ball, and the batsman's position concerning the stumps. If the ball touches any part of the batsman's leg or body below the knee, and the umpire believes that, had the leg not intervened, the ball would have continued on to hit the stumps, then the batsman can be declared out LBW. It's essential to understand that LBW decisions can be quite intricate. Umpires take into account various factors, including the trajectory of the ball, the batsman's stance, whether the batsman attempted to play a shot, and whether the ball was heading towards the stumps. So, while the term "impact" in LBW primarily refers to the moment when the ball makes contact with the batsman's body, it extends beyond merely the legs, and the final decision relies on a multitude of factors beyond just the point of contact. LBW Rules with Images
Saad Baig will lead the 15-player Pakistan U19 squad in the ICC U19 Men’s Cricket World Cup, which is being played from January 19 to February 11, 2024, in South Africa.
Pakistan U19 Squad for U19 Cricket World Cup 2024
Support Staff:
Chairman Junior Selection Committee Sohail Tanvir said: “I want to congratulate the 15 players who have made it into the squad for South Africa, and I am confident that this well-balanced side has the capability and potential to perform well in the World Cup.
“While picking the team, we have considered the conditions in South Africa where the pitches are conducive to pace bowling and have aimed to cover all bases.” U19 World Cup 2024: Exciting Schedule, Top Run-Scorers, and Leading Wicket-Takers Unveiled!1/31/2024
This beautifully formatted schedule presents the U19 World Cup matches in an organized and easy-to-read manner, providing details about the teams, match outcomes, dates, times, and venues. U19 World Cup Most Runs 2024
U19 World Cup Most Wickets 2024
The U19 World Cup 2024 has been an exhilarating journey for cricket enthusiasts worldwide, witnessing the emergence of young talent on the international stage. As the tournament progresses, the Points Table serves as a pivotal indicator of team performance, reflecting their prowess and determination. In this blog, we delve into a comprehensive analysis of the U19 World Cup 2024 Points Table, unraveling the triumphs, setbacks, and remarkable displays of skill exhibited by the competing teams.
Group A: India Dominates the Field
In Group A, India Under-19 showcased sheer dominance, clinching victory in all three matches and securing the top position with an impressive Net Run Rate (NRR) of +3.240. Bangladesh, Ireland, and USA Under-19 teams displayed commendable efforts but fell short against India's formidable lineup.
Group B: South Africa's Resilience Shines Through
Group B witnessed intense competition, with South Africa Under-19 emerging as the frontrunners. Despite facing challenges from England and West Indies, South Africa's resilience led them to victory in two matches, earning them a spot in the next stage of the tournament.
Group C and D: Australia and Pakistan Dominate
Australia Under-19 asserted their dominance in Group C, securing a flawless record with three wins and topping the table with an impressive NRR of +2.606. Meanwhile, in Group D, Pakistan Under-19 showcased their prowess, remaining undefeated with four wins, showcasing their potential to emerge as strong contenders for the championship title.
Conclusion
As the U19 World Cup 2024 unfolds, each match brings forth moments of exhilaration and anticipation. The Points Table stands as a testament to the unwavering spirit and determination of young cricketers, paving the way for an enthralling culmination to this prestigious tournament. Stay tuned as the journey continues, promising more excitement, surprises, and unforgettable moments on the cricketing battlefield.
U19 World Cup Points Table 2024Group A
Group B
Group C
Group D
U19 World Cup Super Six 1 Points Table
U19 World Cup Super Six 2 Points Table
In the realm of cricket, few shots are as captivating as the cover drive, a stroke that marries grace with precision. Babar Azam and Virat Kohli, two modern-day maestros of the game, have enamored fans worldwide with their impeccable batting techniques. Among their many exemplary shots, the cover drive stands out as a hallmark of their batting prowess. Let's delve into a comparison of how these two cricketing stalwarts execute this stroke with finesse and elegance. Babar Azam: The Artisan's TouchBabar Azam, hailed as the crown jewel of Pakistan cricket, exudes elegance in every aspect of his batting. His cover drive is no exception. With a seamless blend of timing, footwork, and balance, Babar's cover drive is a sight to behold. The Pakistani batsman possesses a fluid technique, allowing him to caress the ball through the covers effortlessly. Virat Kohli: The Master CraftsmanVirat Kohli, the epitome of consistency in modern cricket, showcases a cover drive that's as authoritative as it is aesthetically pleasing. Known for his impeccable wristwork and precise placement, Kohli's cover drive is a testament to his impeccable batting technique. The Indian captain combines power with finesse, often threading the ball through the smallest of gaps with surgical precision. Comparison:While both batsmen excel in executing the cover drive, there are subtle nuances that set their approaches apart. Babar Azam relies on his impeccable timing and graceful bat swing to guide the ball through the covers with elegance. On the other hand, Virat Kohli's cover drive is characterized by a blend of power and placement, often punctuating his strokes with authority. But If we see other reviews and fan base so, Babar Azam's cover drive exudes sheer beauty, surpassing even Virat Kohli's, with its flawless execution and aesthetic appeal. Azam's graceful bat swing and impeccable timing make his cover drive a sight to behold, elevating it to a level of elegance unmatched by his contemporaries. Review by Famous Cricketers and Journalists:Wasim Akram (Former Pakistan Cricketer): "Babar Azam's cover drive is a thing of beauty, reminiscent of the classic strokes of yesteryears. His fluidity and poise make it a joy to watch." Harsha Bhogle (Renowned Cricket Analyst): "Virat Kohli's cover drive is a masterclass in precision and control. The way he finds the gaps with surgical precision is a testament to his batting genius." Nasir Hussain (Former England Cricketer): “Sorry Indian fans I’m gonna be biased and go with Babar Azam. I nearly went with Kohli but he is slightly different He has the fast flick of the wrist but Babar has the conventional way of playing it,” Conclusion:In the grand tapestry of cricketing elegance, Babar Azam and Virat Kohli's cover drives stand as exquisite brushstrokes, each painting a picture of perfection in its own right. Whether it's Azam's fluid grace or Kohli's calculated precision, both batsmen showcase the beauty of the cover drive, leaving an indelible mark on the cricketing canvas.
Shaheen Shah Afridi and Mohammad Amir teamed up to bowl for Desert Vipers against Gulf Giants during the second season of ILT20. As this was their first bowling together since 2020, there was immense excitement among cricket fans.
Debut of Shaheen:
Despite missing the first game due to national commitments, Shaheen had a stellar debut. In his four-over spell, the 23-year-old scored 22 runs while taking three wickets while conceding just three. Guests were awed by his bowling prowess and awed by his performance.
Contribution of Amir:
The seasoned pacer Mohammad Amir, however, made a significant contribution by taking one wicket for 27 runs in four overs. Amir showed off his skills and experience on the field despite his retirement, reminding fans of the memorable moments he had created.
Shadab and Azam perform exciting performances:
Two more Pakistani players, Azam Khan and Shadab Khan, were also part of the Desert Vipers. With a quickfire innings, Azam Khan showed off his power-hitting skills, entertaining the crowd with his boundary-hitting. During Desert Vipers' victory, he contributed 26 runs in 14 balls with a quick knock. As a talented all-rounder, Shadab Khan contributed greatly to the team's success.
Memorable Occasion for Pakistan Cricket Fans:
Seeing Shaheen, Amir, Azam, and Shadab play together and secure a win was nothing short of a cricketing delight for Pakistan fans. There was an extra layer of excitement added to the match by the chemistry between these players, each of whom brought their own skills and approaches to the game. Amir and Shaheen's reunion, along with Azam and Shadab's presence, brought back fond memories of their collective contributions to Pakistan's international success.
A memorable match between the Desert Vipers and Gulf Giants in ILT20 season two was played between the Desert Vipers and Gulf Giants. Shaheen Shah Afridi and Mohammad Amir's reunion, coupled with the exciting performances of Azam Khan and Shadab Khan, made for an exciting contest, leaving fans eager for more such moments. Seeing the pair bowl together after 20 years was an exciting experience for Pakistan fans.
Mohammad Amir vs Shaheen Afridi: Stats & Records
AMIR and shaheen batting and bowling statsBatting Stats: T20
Batting Stats: ODI
Batting Stats: Test
Bowling Stats: T20
Bowling Stats: ODI
Bowling Stats: Test
Babar Azam (Pakistan):Current Bat: Babar Azam is currently using a Gray-Nicolls cricket bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from brands like HS (Hunts County Bats) and CA Sports Steve Smith (Australia):Current Bat: Steve Smith is currently using a Kookaburra cricket bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from Gray-Nicolls. Temba Bavuma (South Africa):Current Bat: Temba Bavuma is currently using a New Balance bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from Gunn & Moore (GM). Shakib Al Hasan (Bangladesh):Current Bat: Shakib Al Hasan is currently using a SS (Sareen Sports Industries) bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from brands like Gray-Nicolls and CA Sports. Virat Kohli (India):Current Bat: Virat Kohli is currently using the MRF Grand Edition cricket bat. Old Bat: Previously, he has used bats from brands like Adidas and SS (Sareen Sports Industries). Joe Root (England):Current Bat: Joe Root is currently using a New Balance bat. Old Bat: In the past, he has used bats from Gunn & Moore (GM). Kieron Pollard (West Indies): Current Bat: Kieron Pollard is currently using a Spartan cricket bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from brands like CA Sports. Rashid Khan (Afghanistan):Current Bat: Rashid Khan is currently using a MRF cricket bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from brands like Gray-Nicolls. Kusal Mendis (Bangladesh):Current Bat: Kusal Mendis is currently using a Gunn & Moore (GM) bat. Old Bat: He has previously used bats from brands like Kookaburra. Kane Williamson (New Zealand):Current Bat: Kane Williamson is currently using a Gray-Nicolls bat.
Old Bat: He has previously used bats from Kookaburra. Are you an aspiring cricket player gearing up to invest in a new bat? Perhaps you're a seasoned player looking to upgrade your equipment for that extra edge on the field. Whatever your level of expertise, selecting the right bat is crucial for your performance. With countless options available in the market, it's essential to know exactly what to look for to make an informed decision. Fear not, as we've compiled a comprehensive bat review checklist to guide you through the process. MATERIAL:The material of the bat significantly impacts its performance. Bats are commonly made of wood, aluminum, composite materials, or a combination of these. Each material has its advantages and disadvantages, so it's essential to choose one that suits your playing style and preferences. Size and Weight:Selecting the appropriate size and weight of the bat is crucial for comfort and performance. Bats come in various lengths and weights, and choosing the right combination can enhance your swing and control. Consider factors such as your height, strength, and swing speed when determining the ideal size and weight for your bat. Grip:The grip of the bat affects your control and comfort while swinging. Ensure that the bat's grip is comfortable and provides sufficient traction to prevent slipping during play. Some bats come with adjustable grips or allow for customization, so explore different options to find what works best for you. Balance and Swing Weight:A well-balanced bat with an appropriate swing weight can improve your batting performance. Test the bat's balance by holding it and swinging it to gauge how it feels in your hands. A balanced bat offers better control and maneuverability during swings. Durability:Durability is a critical factor, especially if you're investing in a high-quality bat. Examine the construction and materials used to ensure that the bat is sturdy enough to withstand repeated use without compromising its performance. Sweet Spot:The sweet spot refers to the part of the bat that delivers maximum power and accuracy when struck. Look for a bat with a well-defined sweet spot that aligns with your hitting preferences. Testing the bat by hitting balls at different points along its surface can help you identify the location of its sweet spot. Brand and Reputation:Opting for a reputable brand known for producing high-quality bats can give you peace of mind regarding the bat's performance and durability. Research customer reviews and feedback to gauge the reputation of different bat brands before making your purchase. League Regulations:If you're purchasing a bat for organized league play, ensure that it complies with the regulations and standards set by the governing body of your sport. Different leagues may have specific requirements regarding bat size, weight, and materials, so familiarize yourself with the rules to avoid any issues during competitions. Price and Budget:Finally, consider your budget and the price range of bats available in the market. While quality bats may come with a higher price tag, it's essential to strike a balance between performance and affordability based on your individual needs and preferences. Unveiling the Top Cricket Bat Brands Worldwide!Pakistan:CA Sports: Known for crafting high-quality cricket bats with precision and durability. MB Malik: Renowned for their handmade bats, cherished by professional players worldwide. Australia: Kookaburra: A leading manufacturer of cricket equipment, including bats known for their power and balance. GM (Gunn & Moore): Renowned for their innovative bat technologies and commitment to quality craftsmanship. India:SG (Sanspareils Greenlands): A trusted name in the cricketing world, producing bats that offer exceptional performance. SS (Sareen Sports Industries): Famed for their innovative bat designs and superior craftsmanship. New Zealand:Hunts County Bats: Known for their handcrafted bats made from the finest English willow, delivering exceptional performance. Laver & Wood: A boutique bat maker revered for their bespoke cricket bats, tailored to suit individual player preferences. England:Gray-Nicolls: A heritage brand celebrated for its tradition of excellence in crafting cricket bats. Newbery: Known for their premium-quality English willow bats, meticulously crafted for optimum performance. United States : New Balance: A renowned American sports and apparel brand with a long history, now making strides in cricket with its high-quality equipment, including cricket bats.
|